"For an infinite comedy". Interpretation and development of the theory based on my vision. :o)
Anarcho-comedism, anarcho-comedy, anarcho-humor, AnComedism/AnCom (the way I'll refer to it from now on in the different entries), among other synonyms, is an ideological stance related to the social aspect, where your status in society should be defined according to how funny you can be. If your jokes aren't funny, you don't make people laugh, you're not ironic, you'd become an "outcast" or social marginal (unfunny), to explain it in a way that's understandable. It's a relatively new concept, dating back to at least 2019. NOTE: Rather than focusing on stand-up, as the brief traditional concept does, my vision aligns with clownishness and therefore this manifesto will be quite full of references to clowns.
The ultimate goal of anarcho-comedism is to bring victory and a well-deserved place in society to the best clowns, jesters, mimes, humorists, and any type of entity dedicated to humor and/or ironic entertainment in general. The idea of eliminating the state entirely is proposed, since we consider that its existence imposes restraints and limitations on our system. These concepts will be expanded in [1. - ON THE STATE]. The idea is to create a kind of utopia of humor and irony where those who manage to master the concept of humor are the ones who truly have the chance to stand out, while those who don't make people laugh are set apart from society. This will be discussed in [15. - ON THE "UNFUNNY"]...
(Entries may change or expand as needed).
In summary, AnCom will seek to prioritize those who understand and master the concept of humor, gradually seeking to create a humorous paradise where laughter is eternal, where discomfort does not exist and where we all live happily, always highlighting the people who are the funniest and who maintain the balance of this utopian and comedic society. That said, there is still much more to discuss and develop, and it's possible that this conclusion and definitions are brief. I have based this on a short, direct manifesto that groups together what best defines the ideology, and therefore the format does not allow me to elaborate. Any doubts? Then read on to the considerations!