THE ANARCHO-COMEDIST MANIFESTO

Anarcho-comedism, anarcho-comedy, anarcho-humor, AnComedism/AnComedy (the way I will refer to it from now on in the different entries), among other synonyms, is an ideological stance related to the social aspect, where it is considered that your status in society should be defined according to how funny you can be. In the event that your jokes are not funny, do not give laughter, are not ironic, you would become a "separated" or social outcast (unfunny), to explain it in a way that is understood. It is a relatively new concept, dating back to at least 2019. NOTE: Rather than focusing on stand-up, as the traditional narrow concept does, my vision aligns based on the clownish and therefore this manifesto will be quite full of references to clowns.

The ultimate purpose of anarcho-comedism is to bring to victory and well-deserved place in society those who deserve it: the best clowns, jesters, mimes, humorists, and any type of entity dedicated to humor and/or ironic entertainment in general. The idea is to completely eliminate the state, since we consider that its existence proposes retentions and limitations to our system. This will be expanded in [1. ABOUT THE STATE]. The idea is to create a kind of utopia of humor and irony where those who manage to dominate the concept of humor are those who really have the chance to stand out, while those who do not give laughter are separated from society. This will be discussed in [15. – ABOUT THE "UNFUNNY"]..

In summary, AnCom will seek to prioritize those who understand and master the concept of humor, gradually seeking to create a humoristic paradise where laughter is eternal, where discomfort does not exist and where we all live happily, always highlighting the people who are the funniest and who maintain the balance of this utopian and comedic society. That said, much more remains to be discussed and developed, and it is possible that this conclusion and definitions are brief. I have based this on a short, direct manifesto that encompasses what best defines the ideology, and therefore the format does not allow me to elaborate. Any doubts? Then read the considerations!