The "state" has countless definitions and it would be impossible to cover every related field. We will refer to this political entity as a synonym for government, which includes any public organism but mainly "government agents", such as ministries, public officials, leaders, etc. Organisms like the judicial system, police, and army (although this will vary depending on each perspective). Hierarchies and laws will also fall within this category.

We are not revolutionaries. We do not propose the violent eradication of the state. We have nothing against the state, and above all, we do not want to eliminate it just to apply "the law of the jungle" and allow everyone to do whatever they want without consequences, as people tend to think when anarchism is discussed. Why then do we seek the elimination of the state? Simply put, because we consider the state will always be a limiting entity towards our ideology and that it would be impossible to carry it out with such an organ limiting and regulating mood.

The state is inherently limiting, especially towards mood. Different laws can lead to prohibiting, censoring, and regulating the type of humor being developed. This prohibitionism and censorship go against the basic points of AnCom and we consider it the main reason why the state would play an antagonistic role in this context. There are many countries where the state limits freedom of expression and this is also reflected in the type of humor allowed. We consider this then a form of repression that must be eliminated. The endless bureaucracy ("The Process" by Kafka was right) and endless political back-and-forths and paperwork also play a fundamental role in concepts that suffocate the development of creativity and society's humor. With the state absent from our lives, we could then eliminate its limitations on humor and would allow us to achieve the definitive freedom and creativity necessary to "unlock" the maximum expression of humor and comedy. The ability to share joy would now have no legal, cultural, or any other restrictions imposed by the government.

I need to clarify this again. WE ARE NOT REVOLUTIONARIES. Even so, humor can be used as an effective form of complaint and protest against the government and the state. This can be reflected and is something society already does, for example, in the creation of memes that satirize political entities, government authorities, among others. The purpose would be to ridicule the government and make it clear that they are... A joke. :o) Often politicians themselves are and do extremely memeable things and while we find this fine since it generates laughs, it results in a smokescreen so that we do not protest against the injustices and oppressions of the state over AnCom. Humor can then be a powerful way to somehow criticize and, if desired, subvert social norms imposed by the government and question the power it has.

Once people understand the antagonistic role that the government has in their lives (and in this hypothetical case, join the AnCom objective), it could be possible to build communities based on humor as a bond and main reason for union. Being based on laughter, enjoyment will be massive and shared, which is why we again do not advocate for violence under any circumstance. By carrying this out peacefully, the state, now weakened before public opinion, could not act, since it would now be pure political repression. The state's repression will always trigger violent responses or the rise to power of ideologies that will not be as merciful as us, and this is something that both we and the state must avoid. Through comedy and humor, individuals will be able to from this point begin to stand out, have their own brands, and express themselves freely by challenging repressive governmental structures from a satirical angle.

Once the state has been well eliminated or relegated to the background (nevertheless expecting its eventual dissolution) society would have finally won its true freedom of expression and therefore the maximum definition of humor would now be within our reach. An infinite paradise of laughter without borders or limitations imposed by the government. The replacement of certain institutions should be fundamental, but their restructuring must be avoided. The management and handling of this process would be based on the predominant humoristic community though without the need for rigid hierarchies.